AI data center project secretly sucked 29 million gallons of water over 15 months before detected by residents complaining about low water pressure — officials refuse to fine builders of massive 6.2 million-square-foot facility over unauthorized water use
County's soft touch is attributed to the data center being 'our largest customer, and we have to be partners.'
Fayette County, Georgia, was telling residents to stop watering their lawns to conserve water. The request came after homeowners in a nearby subdivision reported unusually low water pressure, but when the county investigated, it found the cause: a data center campus 20 miles south of Atlanta had been drawing roughly 29 million gallons through two water connections the county didn't know existed, Politico reported Saturday.
Quality Technology Services (QTS), the Blackstone-owned developer behind the 615-acre Fayetteville campus, owed $147,474 in retroactive charges for the unmetered consumption, but the county didn’t fine the company.
The QTS Fayetteville (“Project Excalibur”) campus is among the largest data center developments in the country, currently comprising 13 buildings totaling approximately 6.2 million square feet, with plans for up to 16 buildings at full buildout. QTS has said it expects to invest up to $1 billion in the project, which began construction in 2023 and isn’t expected to be completed for another three to five years.
QTS told Politico the 29 million gallons were consumed during temporary construction activities, including concrete work, dust control, and site preparation. The company markets a "closed-loop" cooling system for its data centers, which recirculates the same water rather than drawing from the municipal supply. Once operational, QTS said its facilities would only require water for domestic needs like bathrooms and kitchens.
However, the discrepancy between QTS’s stated and actual water usage remained undetected for months, with Politico reporting that the county’s water system director, Vanessa Tigert, attributed the oversight to a procedural error during the county's transition to a cloud-based metering system.
Tigert told Politico that her department has a single employee handling both inspections and plan reviews, saying, “... we don’t have enough staff. We can’t keep staff.” QTS and the county disagreed on how long the water went unmetered, withTigert estimating about four months and QTS saying 9 to 15 months. Despite the unauthorized connections, Fayette County opted not to fine the company. "They're our largest customer, and we have to be partners," Tigert said. "It's called customer service."
The incident came to light last week after a Fayette County resident obtained the utility's May 2025 letter to QTS through a public records request. Fayetteville had already moved to restrict data center growth before this, with the city council banning new data centers in every zoning district earlier this year, adopting Ordinance 26-0-12. A separate proposal from developer Crow Holdings was denied by the city's planning commission in January, and the company withdrew its appeal in March.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Georgia's Public Service Commission also froze Georgia Power's base rates through 2028, specifically to prevent data centers from shifting electricity costs to residential customers. The state is currently experiencing moderate to severe drought, and Gov. Brian Kemp declared a state of emergency last month over wildfires. Georgia hosts more than 200 data center facilities.
The QTS campus is projected to generate $150 million to $200 million annually in property tax revenue, according to the city. Fayetteville is one of at least 50 cities across the U.S. that currently have active bans on new data center construction, with four adopting permanent prohibitions, according to the U.S. Data Center Moratorium Tracker.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
papaspud Make it sound big- " 29 MILLION GALLONS!!!" That is nothing for water; it is 89 acre-feet. Look up how much water even a small pond holds....Reply
Typical chicken little reporting.... -
jester5555 Reply
That's 45.5 Olympic sized swimming pools at 6.6 feet deep for a better perspective.papaspud said:Make it sound big- " 29 MILLION GALLONS!!!" That is nothing for water; it is 89 acre-feet. Look up how much water even a small pond holds....
Typical chicken little reporting.... -
Zaranthos Replypapaspud said:Make it sound big- " 29 MILLION GALLONS!!!" That is nothing for water; it is 89 acre-feet. Look up how much water even a small pond holds....
Typical chicken little reporting....
If water usage is a problem then communities need to push for legislation or contractual deals (local tax incentives with strings attached) that provide solutions instead of just complaining or trying to ban projects. Look into grey water cooling options or desalinization plants and pipelines that require designs and implementations that have a net positive benefit to the local communities. These projects don't have to be automatically demonized and should be a net benefit local economies by providing more jobs, more quality water (require water treatment and purification), and more power (make the data center build power infrastructure). -
Ralston18 Follow the money.....Reply
Communities can "push" all they want but until there are some serious reforms regarding campaign "contributions" etc. the same problems will continue to occur.
Cynicism conceded. -
Findecanor I think the water supply to the data centre should be shut off until they have fixed the problem of excess usage, just like for everyone else.Reply -
palladin9479 Looks like it was for construction and the County lost paperwork. You need a County water person to even turn on water so it was approved.Reply
And yes that much construction requires water. No different then any other large building. -
Freddy D Someone in city government getting envelopes of cash left in their mailbox at night .. that's why no penaltyReply -
thestryker So let's see here there was one unauthorized hook up and they use more water than the maximum they'd agreed to then simply have to pay retroactively for the usage. Something absolutely doesn't add up that there would be no fines for the clear infractions. Once again looks like a situation where money is doing all the talking.Reply