Intel CEO is "frustrated" with CHIPS Act payout progress — Intel has received $0 from the $8.5 billion that the US government promised

Pat Gelsinger
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger is frustrated with the U.S. government’s slow progress in providing his company with its promised CHIPS Act funding. The New York Times shared recent interviews with Gelsinger and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo about the CHIPS and Science Act.

The Biden-backed CHIPS Act represents $280 billion of funding for semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, giving the Commerce Dept. the ability to provide 10-figure grants and loans to companies like TSMC and Intel to supercharge a young U.S.-based chip industry. The Biden administration has promised Intel $8.5 billion in direct funding to build its new chipmaking fabs (plus $11 billion in loans and a 25% investment tax credit of up to $100 billion). Still, the company has not seen any of these funds so far.

Missing the funds is a problem for Intel, which is in turmoil due to $1.6 billion in losses in Q2 2024. Intel is cutting 15% of its workforce, representing 15,000 or more workers worldwide. Gelsinger has spent the past three months since the disastrous August earnings call restructuring his company and placating stockholders. He has become “frustrated” with the roadblocks the government has put in between Intel and its CHIPS Act funds.

“My simple message is, ‘Let’s get it finished,’” said Gelsinger in an interview. “There’s been renegotiations on both sides.” The U.S. government put some objectives between CHIPS Act recipients and their money, with milestones including completing building projects, securing customers, etc. “Obviously, with elections, you know, nigh in front of us, hey, we want this done,” said Gelsinger, with the possibility of a new presidential regime lighting a fire of urgency.

This reticence to give out CHIPS Act funding right away apparently stemmed from fears from the government that Intel specifically would not meet its promises. “[There is fear that] Intel is going to take chips money, build an empty shell of a factory and then never actually open it, because they don’t have customers,” said former Commerce Department official Caitlin Legacki.

Gelsinger’s tenure as CEO since 2021 has been marked by a desire to rebuild the company in a foundry-forward direction. One of the major forces behind lobbying for the CHIPS Act, Gelsinger also supercharged the Intel Foundry division, which, despite its extremely high costs, has been deemed crucial for Intel's long-term success. The foundry is set to be spun off into an independent subsidiary, with its overseas operations paused for the next two years while its U.S. facilities are prioritized.

According to reports from last month, Intel is set to receive its first round of CHIPS Act funds before the end of 2024. Gelsinger, as mentioned above, is anxious to receive funds before the election, and Qualcomm is reportedly waiting until the election to make a move on purchasing Intel assets.

Dallin Grimm
Contributing Writer

Dallin Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Dallin has a handle on all the latest tech news. 

  • doomtomb
    From the time Gelsinger said he was going to double down on fabs, I knew Intel's fate was sealed. Fabs are extremely difficult and expensive undertakings. I'd say give him the money but don't be surprised when it doesn't work out and he comes back for more. Then say no and let the markets decide.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Has any company received money through the CHIPS act or is it just some fraud with the gov keeping all of the money for themselves?
    Reply
  • DS426
    Why is there talk on Qualcomm acquiring Intel again? Do they really think that would and should get past anti-trust hurdles? I just don't think it's good for consumers at all, nor the tech industry as a whole. If Intel gets these funds and gets some more positive news out, surely they'd claw back enough market cap to make this a merger scenario, not an acquisition? (Not that I see that as any better).
    Reply
  • diminishedfifth
    And people are frustrated with Intel because of their sketchy actions but they're still there doing it.
    Reply
  • wbfox
    And we're all tired of your taking of US taxpayer money then turning around and firing more US workers, selling off more chunks of Intel, and entirely failing to do anything other than trying to sell Intel's way out of this problem Pat.
    Reply
  • wbfox
    DS426 said:
    Why is there talk on Qualcomm acquiring Intel again? Do they really think that would and should get past anti-trust hurdles? I just don't think it's good for consumers at all, nor the tech industry as a whole. If Intel gets these funds and gets some more positive news out, surely they'd claw back enough market cap to make this a merger scenario, not an acquisition? (Not that I see that as any better).
    There is no such thing as a merger. One will always win, be it via an overt victory like an acquisition or internal power struggle post merger (see Boeing and McDonnell Douglas).
    Reply
  • scottsoapbox
    I'm frustrated that my money is going to the worst chip company (currently) because they have better political connections than their rivals.

    Let the market rather than politicians decide where money goes.
    Reply
  • joeer77
    I want my corporate welfare money waaahhh.

    I want my cut of Q1 2025 Intel earnings since you took my tax money.
    Reply
  • RUSerious
    Do you guys understand, that like almost every country on the planet, we subsidize US business to the tune of 100s of Billions a year in grants and tax breaks? That money helps keep millions of jobs in the US. Maybe you'd rather they all be out of work collecting welfare and SNAP benefits. I'd rather subsidize work rather than subsidizing poverty.
    Reply
  • plutarchheavensbee62
    wbfox said:
    And we're all tired of your taking of US taxpayer money then turning around and firing more US workers, selling off more chunks of Intel, and entirely failing to do anything other than trying to sell Intel's way out of this problem Pat.
    They haven't received a cent of chips act money buddy
    Reply