Intel closes out RAMP-C production pilot that paid Nvidia and others to run test chips on 18A — program helped lay a path for secure domestic chip production on advanced processes

Intel's headquarters in Santa Clara, Calif.
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel Foundry says that it has completed RAMP-C, the United States government program awarded to the company in 2021 to stand up a secure, domestic leading-edge chip ecosystem on its 18A process. The program funneled money to commercial and defense partners to run test chips on a design kit that wasn't finished yet, and its conclusion marks readiness for external customers who will pay full price to fabricate real products, including those who might use the Intel Secure Enclave manufacturing flow that RAMP-C helped to shape.

The announcement doesn't name any customers that Intel may have secured as a result of RAMP-C, although the program roster has been public for years and includes Nvidia, Microsoft, IBM, Qualcomm, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman. That may be down to the sensitive nature of any actual defense industrial base (DIB) products that are likely to be produced with the Secure Enclave defense-focused manufacturing flow for those products, which spans project stages from design to chip fabrication to advanced packaging.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • TerryLaze
    Admin said:
    Secure Enclave, the follow-on program Intel references, is worth up to $3 billion and was finalized alongside the company's $7.86 billion CHIPS Act award in November 2024. Congress required that CHIPS money pay for it, which is why the commercial grant is smaller than the $8.5 billion originally proposed.
    You misspelled hostile partial takeover...
    Intel didn't get anything awarded or granted, they were forced to buy that money with shares.
    Reply