Intel tells PC makers to adopt 18A CPUs or lose their supply, report claims — Intel 7 supply dries up, pressuring notebook and PC manufacturers in the US, China, and Taiwan

Intel logo
(Image credit: Getty / Future Publishing)

Intel is pressuring notebook and PC manufacturers in the U.S., China, and Taiwan to build more systems around its 18A-based processors, according to a Nikkei Asia report published today. The company has effectively frozen additional supply of older Intel 7-based CPUs for the consumer market, multiple industry sources told the publication, leaving OEMs with the choice of designing around 18A or going without.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • usertests
    Many PC makers had originally built only a handful of 18A-based models to support Intel's launch rather than in response to consumer demand, the report claims. "Frankly speaking, PC makers designed a few models based on 18A last year mainly as a favor to Intel, as the chip is expensive and the market demand is relatively small because it is too premium," another source told Nikkei Asia.
    You're also forced to use DDR5/LPDDR5X. No more DDR4, LPDDR4X, maybe even LPDDR5?

    Maybe Alder Lake-N/Twin Lake supply will dry up. Those are low priority chips made on Intel 7. Intel could continue making the embedded variants for customers with $$$.
    Reply
  • JC5000
    Admin said:
    Intel has redirected its constrained Intel 7 capacity toward server and industrial customers.

    Intel tells PC makers to adopt 18A CPUs or lose their supply, report claims — Intel 7 supply dries up, pressuring notebook and PC manufacturers in... : Read mor

    Has anyone thought about making MORE chip making robots?? We are out of chips because people are making too many computers and robots...

    THE CHIPS ARE MADE BY COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS...
    Reply
  • gdmaclew
    Why does this sound familiar?
    Reply
  • hwertz
    Seems cheeky for someone to order 100 chips and Intel just sends them different chips they didn't order.

    Just to note, this is a reason it's nice to do AMD's strategy of NOT changing the socket every 2 or so models. (Intel's 'tick-tock' cadence... 'tick', a new model needing a new socket, 'tock', a refinement of that chip... then 'tick' a new socket again). If AMD started ramping down production of older models, it's possible it'd barely make the tech news since vendors would need (at worst case) a BIOS update (updated AMD AGESA firmware really.) Since they all use the AM5 socket (other than Threadripper since the socket is bigger, but they have a TR5 socket for compatibility up and down the line as well.)
    Reply
  • salgado18
    hwertz said:
    Seems cheeky for someone to order 100 chips and Intel just sends them different chips they didn't order.

    Just to note, this is a reason it's nice to do AMD's strategy of NOT changing the socket every 2 or so models. (Intel's 'tick-tock' cadence... 'tick', a new model needing a new socket, 'tock', a refinement of that chip... then 'tick' a new socket again). If AMD started ramping down production of older models, it's possible it'd barely make the tech news since vendors would need (at worst case) a BIOS update (updated AMD AGESA firmware really.) Since they all use the AM5 socket (other than Threadripper since the socket is bigger, but they have a TR5 socket for compatibility up and down the line as well.)
    I agree, but I believe it would happen similarly in the transition from AM4 to AM5. It didn't only because AMD themselves recognized that AM4 was its budget line, instead of just an old tech.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    SOS, DD from the Intel regime. And they wonder why OEMs dispise them... :anguished:
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Maybe sell it at a discount if no one wants it intel 😂
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    Looks like Intel is up to its old shenanigans again. Intel has a very long habit of trying to make decisions for the market and force it in a certain direction. They don't like to be told what is and is not desirable by market forces. Not good. AMD acts as a good counterweight, but with corporations gobbling up every piece of tech they can for AI-related things, we do not have enough competition in the CPU space for today's status quo.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Headline makes it sound like a threat. Rather the news is simply that there is not enough of the older chips to go around. Take the new chips or don't.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Intel 7 still underpins a large portion of Intel’s product line, from consumer notebook and desktop CPUs like Raptor Lake to Xeon 6 “Granite Rapids” server processors.
    It's only used for IO Die in GNR which is of negligible impact volume wise. SPR and EMR still being made are eating up a much larger portion of available volume.
    Reply