New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

AWWS data center
(Image credit: Getty)

Utah's Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA) on Friday approved a development agreement for a hyperscale data center campus in Box Elder County that could eventually consume 9 GW of power, more than double the state's current average electricity use of roughly 4 GW, according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

The project, dubbed Stratos, is being developed by O'Leary Digital, the infrastructure arm of Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary, and would span 40,000 acres of private land plus 1,200 acres of military and state-owned property.

Phase 1 alone calls for approximately 3 GW of generation capacity. At full buildout, the campus would reach 9 GW, all produced on-site through a connection to the Ruby Pipeline, a 680-mile interstate natural gas line that crosses northern Utah on its route from Wyoming to Oregon. MIDA executive director Paul Morris told county commissioners that the facility “will not take one electron” from the existing grid and could eventually feed surplus power back into it.

Article continues below

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • ekio
    The day some researcher find a model that needs 100x less calculation for a given result, they will be like idiot with overpowered centers
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    Insanity.
    Reply
  • Shiznizzle
    I hope they are going to filter the exhaust of the thing if it is powered by gas as per article. If it produces more emissions than the state as a whole, how are they going to deal with them?

    161.87426 Square Kilometers for the 40k acre's. I dont do acre's so had to convert it so it makes more sense to me I am a cyclist so Km i can do and 160 square kilometers in old money is 100 square miles. Nuts. Nuts. Nuts

    That i just insane. More pollutants than the whole state of utah for one facility. We are indeed approaching insanity.

    Most of the population is centered around Salt Lake City/Provo, where my cheating ex lives. So what if a few people breathe some bad air eh?
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    This is the least stupid data center thing I've read recently. They seem to be trying to do things right by providing their own power. There's still the problem of water and cooling. Still, nice to see a project that is trying to provide its own resources instead of draining all of them from the local communities.

    I have a bad feeling that these AI data centers will all be deserted Superfund sites in 15-20 years.
    Reply
  • quorm
    Take solace in the fact that this facility is unlikely to ever be built. The gas turbines and other essential elements are unlikely to become available before the bottom falls out of the datacenter buildout.

    That said, it's BS to say this is "off the grid." They're just planning to consume natural gas instead of electricity, and that would obviously affect prices and produce a lot of additional pollution.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    quorm said:
    Take solace in the fact that this facility is unlikely to ever be built. The gas turbines and other essential elements are unlikely to become available before the bottom falls out of the datacenter buildout.

    That said, it's BS to say this is "off the grid." They're just planning to consume natural gas instead of electricity, and that would obviously affect prices and produce a lot of additional pollution.
    How much pollution does burning natural gas make?
    Reply
  • Ron Olbrey
    The energy in the total biomass of a football field of average forest is 233MWh, if burned to ash in one hour, that would be a continuous heat output of 233MW. A 9,000MW data center fueled by 40% efficient natural gas turbines would use 22,500MW of natural gas, 13,500 released as waste heat and 9000MW of electricity turned to heat in the data center.

    This datacenter will emit the heat of 96 football fields of forest burning to ash every hour, of every day, 365 days a year.

    Forget global warming, living downwind would be unbearable.
    Reply
  • WINTERLORD
    It said somthing bout the millitary if its for millitary wouldn't be good in modern times to build all ur eggs in one basket with drone warfare an such ul want smaller ones everywhere for the robot invasion
    Reply
  • Ron Olbrey
    Ron Olbrey said:
    The energy in the total biomass of a football field of average forest is 233MWh, if burned to ash in one hour, that would be a continuous heat output of 233MW. A 9,000MW data center fueled by 40% efficient natural gas turbines would use 22,500MW of natural gas, 13,500 released as waste heat and 9000MW of electricity turned to heat in the data center.

    This datacenter will emit the heat of 96 football fields of forest burning to ash every hour, of every day, 365 days a year.

    Forget global warming, living downwind would be unbearable.
    It would make much more sense to locate this data center in Calgary Canada. The whole province of Alberta hits a peak demand in winter of 12,384MW, mostly heating, while summer demand peaks at only 1,824MW. A 9,000MW data center creates 22,500MW of total heat that could be transferred by hot water to provide free heat to the entire city, with plenty left over to heat greenhouses to grow winter vegetables for local use and export. A tiny fraction of the total electricity production could light the greenhouses. The gas turbine exhaust could be vented directly to the greenhouses for 100% efficient heating and enhanced growth due to high CO2 levels. This is already done in many large scale greenhouses.

    This would make use of the heat that would otherwise be wasted, reduce overall energy usage and CO2 production by directly replacing gas furnace heating, reduce data center AC cooling load, greatly reduce water used for evaporative cooling, and eliminate most push back from the community.

    But then land in Utah is cheap and those subsidies sure are nice.
    Reply
  • xiq
    These data centers are gonna set us back so much on the fight against global warming. I'm sure there's some sort of law that limits how much pollution these data centers can cause, but ideally these shouldn't be powered by anything but solar energy. It's not like they're essential facilities that need to stay on while society gradually transitions to renewable energy.
    Reply