Microsoft and Nvidia launch AI partnership to speed up nuclear power plant permitting and construction — simulation tools and generative models could hasten historically lengthy processes

Nuclear power plant
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Microsoft and Nvidia have announced an AI-powered collaboration to accelerate the development and deployment of nuclear power plants that will power AI data centers in turn.

The partnership, described in a Microsoft blog post, combines generative AI, digital twin simulation, and Nvidia's Omniverse platform to streamline the nuclear lifecycle from permitting through operations. The effort targets what Microsoft's blog calls an infrastructure bottleneck: expensive, years-long permitting processes, fragmented engineering data, and manual regulatory review that delay new nuclear plant construction.

Article continues below

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • ezst036
    Nah. Not gonna happen. Not in my lifetime. They'll get maybe 2 new power generating plants -tops. 2 tops, in like 40 years.

    High electric/energy bills are too big to fail.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    ahh yes two of the top reasons for "enshitification" of the technological world together....
    Reply
  • usertests
    Aalo Atomics, an Austin-based startup building modular nuclear reactors for data centers, has said that it reduced its permitting process workload by 92% using Microsoft's Generative AI for Permitting solution, saving an estimated $80 million annually.
    We'll end up with corporate AIs generating documents for government AIs to read.

    hotaru251 said:
    ahh yes two of the top reasons for "enshitification" of the technological world together....
    The small modular reactors are promising and can have design features that make them safer than the big ones. They have taken forever to move from hype to reality though. Same with thorium.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I suppose I shouldn't point out to Microsoft that the most recent construction failures in the US were due to companies cutting corners and nothing to do with the government. The problem with nuclear is a capitalism one not a building one. Digital twins and better simulation are things every company with high design overhead have gone to so this part is nothing new.

    Having ai anywhere near document generation should be a giant no, but there's almost no way the current US administration would stand in its way.
    Reply
  • Air2004
    "Two things matter most: enterprise-scale complexity and mission-critical reliability," Yasir Arafat, chief technology officer at Aalo, said in the blog post.
    Am I the only one who noticed this ? 😂
    I must be getting old.
    Reply
  • Christopher_115
    thestryker said:
    The problem with nuclear is a capitalism one not a building one.

    The problem is 100% government overregulation.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Christopher_115 said:
    The problem is 100% government overregulation.
    Are you aware that regulations are written in blood?
    As in, governments don't bother writing any regulation until a lot of bodies have started to pile up and it's causing a stink.

    The only other regulations are written in bribes. As in, one company will bribe politicians so that their product can corner the market because it is mandated by law.
    Reply
  • Dementoss
    Are the AI companies, that want these modular nuclear power plants built, going to pay for the very long and drawn-out process of decommissioning, when they reach the end of their useful life? Will those AI companies still exist?

    There are two nuclear power plants being decommissioned, near where I live in Southwest England, Hinckley Point A & B. The process will take around 50 years to complete. Modular plants will be smaller but, the problem of intense radioactivity taking decades to die away, before the reactors can be dismantled, will be the same.
    Reply
  • Dementoss
    Christopher_115 said:
    The problem is 100% government overregulation.
    What would you rather have, strict regulation and safe nuclear power plants or, corners cut in building and running the plants then, an outcome similar to Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
    Reply
  • helper800
    usertests said:
    We'll end up with corporate AIs generating documents for government AIs to read.


    The small modular reactors are promising and can have design features that make them safer than the big ones. They have taken forever to move from hype to reality though. Same with thorium.
    Dementoss said:
    What would you rather have, strict regulation and safe nuclear power plants or, corners cut in building and running the plants then, an outcome similar to Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
    Dementoss said:
    Are the AI companies, that want these modular nuclear power plants built, going to pay for the very long and drawn-out process of decommissioning, when they reach the end of their useful life? Will those AI companies still exist?

    There are two nuclear power plants being decommissioned, near where I live in Southwest England, Hinckley Point A & B. The process will take around 50 years to complete. Modular plants will be smaller but, the problem of intense radioactivity taking decades to die away, before the reactors can be dismantled, will be the same.
    Tons of misinformation in here about nuclear. Nuclear is the safest form of electricity as far as work accidents. The big nuclear plants are outrageously safe. We will never see a 3 mile island type accident again, and its actually impossible for another chernobyl type event to happen again. It does not take 50 years to dismantle any nuclear plant. Highly radioactive materials have the fastest half lives. is more of the moderate to low radioactive waste materials that have many+ year half lives. The storage casks that everything is put into blocks all radiation, and can survive a hit from a missile, literally. Nuclear is also the cheapest form of energy if accounted for the lifetime of the plants which is almost always 70 years or more. Radioactive waste is also not, even in my list of most harmful catastrophes.
    Reply