Samsung takes a scalpel to its 2nm wafer price tag, bringing it down to $20,000 — Korean chipmaker now undercuts rival TSMC by 33%
Samsung throws the gauntlet to TMSC, which recently rose its pricing thanks to overwhelming demand.

Worldwide cutting-edge chip production is at capacity everywhere, as high-tech companies like Nvidia can't get nearly enough supply to satisfy their demand. However, even though it's a seller's market, there's still a degree of competition between chip foundries. Samsung has apparently elected to cut its 2nm (SF2, aka SF3P) wafer pricing down to $20,000, undercutting market leader TSMC's purported $30,000 price by a good one-third, according to DigiTimes.
The move is aggressive for Samsung, but likely necessary as to not let its 2nm fab capacity remain unused, and ensure some return on the investment. The company's 2nm initiatives faced significant headwinds, with Samsung reportedly cutting its investment in foundries by half back in January — all while TSMC did the exact opposite — and delaying its mint-fresh Texas chip fab due to a lack of customers.
It's not all doom and gloom, though, as Samsung recently scored a juicy $16.5 billion deal with none other than Tesla, for the production the EV maker's AI6 chip. It's also noteworthy that the chips will be manufactured in Samsung's aforementioned Texas facility, turning this deal into a nice 2-in-1 shot in the arm for the Korean company's fab efforts. Tesla's requirements and assistance ought to help Samsung improve its yields (as the requirement is 60 to 70%), further helping support its position as a high-end foundry.
DIgiTimes also remarks that Samsung's foundries have a track record of competing on price. Given TSMC's current and future fabs are running at full capacity and demanding a corresponding premium price, Samsung's $20,000-per-wafer figure is assuredly an enticing option for clients unable or unwilling to pay TSMC's ask.
TSMC probably remains quite unconcerned, given that it has the largest slice of the 2nm pie by a large margin, having reportedly signed up 15 large clients for its 2nm fabs, counting Intel, AMD, and MediaTek alongside long-time partner Nvidia.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.
-
Notton The rumor is Exynos 2600 in the Galaxy S26 will be built on Samsung GAAFET 2nm.Reply
So we don't have to wait that long to see how well Samsung 2nm is. -
JTWrenn This is good for everyone. Pricing competition is what we need at this level. Let's hope we get even more from other competitors....or that they actually become competitive again.Reply -
shady28 I don't think people will be happy when they see prices of N2 parts when they come out. It looks to be ~2X what we were seeing with N5/N4, and maybe 50% higher than N3.Reply
The problem here though, is that Samsung's SF2 node is seen as more of a competitor to N3P (TSMC's most advanced, densest N3 node). From what I've read, it's a small bit better than N3P (like 5%), but not really comparable to N2 or 18A for that matter. This price cut makes it an attractive alternative to N3P - not to N2. -
HyperMatrix Logic would dictate that if your node were even remotely competitive with TSMC’s, you wouldn’t need to undercut them by 33% when they’re pretty much already booked solid. Reminds me of when Nvidia broke up with TSMC and tried out Samsung’s “8nm” that one year due to massive incentives given by Samsung. Only to pay even more money than before to get back in with TSMC.Reply -
althuser
Just let China get it right, they will flood these markets with good enough. That all we need to get tyevworks done.George³ said:I'm always am happy when monopoly game is over. -
dev1
Hopefully it will be soon enough, manufacturing wafers is no small feat but they're effectively making more chips per wafer, so it shouldn't be that more expensive.althuser said:Just let China get it right, they will flood these markets with good enough. That all we need to get tyevworks done. -
LordVile
Especially when Apple had just taken up 50% of all N2 capacityHyperMatrix said:Logic would dictate that if your node were even remotely competitive with TSMC’s, you wouldn’t need to undercut them by 33% when they’re pretty much already booked solid. Reminds me of when Nvidia broke up with TSMC and tried out Samsung’s “8nm” that one year due to massive incentives given by Samsung. Only to pay even more money than before to get back in with TSMC.