TSMC unveils process technology roadmap through 2029 — A12, A13, N2U announced, A16 slips to 2027
Still no High-NA on horizon.
TSMC revealed its general manufacturing technology roadmap through 2029 at its North American Technology Symposium 2026 on Wednesday. Among the key highlights the company presented were its 1.2nm and 1.3nm-class fabrication processes called A12 and A13, an unexpected extension of the N2 family named N2U, and the lack of plans to use High-NA EUV lithography for any nodes through 2029. Perhaps the most notable part of the technology-related announcement was firming the multi-faceted approach to new node development.
"Last year we announced A14 as our most advanced, 2nd Generation nanosheet technology, scheduled for production in 2028," said Kevin Zhang, senior vice president of business development and global sales and deputy COO at TSMC.
"This year, we are introducing derivatives of A14, including A13 and A12, both planned for production in 2029. A13 is an incremental enhancement of A14 achieved primarily through optical shrink, delivering about 6% area reduction while maintaining full design-rule and electrical compatibility, enabling customers to benefit with minimal redesign."
Changing the rules of the game
Historically the lion's share of TSMC's revenue originated from the smartphone industry, but more recently AI and HPC have outpaced handsets. This was clearly reflected in the company's plans, so TSMC's latest roadmap highlighted a deliberately bifurcated strategy that segments leading-edge nodes by end-market requirements rather than pursuing a one-size-fits-all approach. As a result, the company is adopting a new strategy for process technology introductions in which it will continue to offer a new node for client applications every year and will roll-out a new node for heavy-duty AI and HPC applications every two years.
On one hand, processes like N2, N2P, N2U, A14, and A13 are aimed at smartphones and client devices — where costs, power efficiency, and IP reuse are crucial and strong design compatibility is welcome, while incremental improvements can be tolerated as long as TSMC can deliver a new node every year.
On the other hand, nodes such as A16 and A12, aimed at AI and HPC application, must offer strong performance improvements to justify transition to newer technologies, and costs are less important. These nodes integrate Super Power Rail backside power delivery (SPR) to address power integrity and current delivery constraints of AI data center and HPC workloads and offer tangible performance, power, and transistor density improvements — albeit, at a biennial cadence.
| Row 0 - Cell 0 | A16 vs N2P | N2X vs N2P | N2U vs N2P | A14 vs N2 | A13 vs A14 | A12 vs A16 |
Power | -15% ~ -20% | lower | 8% - 10% | -25% ~ -30% | ? | lower |
Performance | 8% - 10% | 10% | 3% - 4% | 10% - 15% | ? | higher |
Chip Density* | 1.07x - 1.10x | ? | ? | 1.2x | ? | denser |
Logic Density | ? | ? | 1.02X - 1.03X | 1.23x | 1.06X | denser |
Transistor | GAA | GAA | GAA | 2nd Gen GAA | 2nd Gen GAA | 2nd Gen GAA |
Power Delivery | SPR | Front-side w/ SHPMIM (?) | Front-side w/ SHPMIM (?) | Front-side w/ SHPMIM (?) | Front-side w/ SHPMIM (?) | SPR |
HVM | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2029 |
*Chip density published by TSMC reflects 'mixed' chip density consisting of 50% logic, 30% SRAM, and 20% analog.
**At the same area.
***At the same speed.
A13 and N2U: New nodes for client applications
Last year TSMC introduced its A14 process technology, which is set to rely on the company's 2nd Generation gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors, offer additional design flexibility with NanoFlex Pro technology, and serve as the foundry's premium node for high-end smartphone and client applications sometimes in 2028. This year the company announced A13, which will build upon A14.
TSMC's A13 is an optical shrink of A14 designed to extract additional efficiency with minimal disruption. A13 reduces linear dimensions by about 3% (to ~97% scale), which translates into roughly 6% higher transistor density amid maintaining full design-rule and electrical compatibility with A14. From many points of view, A14 continues TSMC's long-standing tradition of offering optical shrinks of its process technologies (N12, N6, N4, N3P) — though, previously, these could deliver more tangible benefits in general. The approach enables TSMC's customers to reuse IP with little to no redesign effort, but with only incremental improvements.
While A14 is set to deliver full-node improvements in power, performance, and density, to extract them, chip and IP designers must use all-new tools, IPs, and design methodologies. By contrast, A13 delivers incremental gains enabled by design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), but which does not require to change anything to extract these gains. A13 is expected to enter production in 2029.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
In addition to offering customers its all-new A14 node in 2028, TSMC plans to offer them a cheap way to improve their N2-based designs with N2U. N2U will be the third-year extension of the N2 platform that leverages DTCO to provide about 3% – 4% higher performance at the same power or 8% – 10% lower power at the same speed while allowing a modest 2% – 3% logic density improvement. The node will maintain compatibility with N2P IP, which will enable its customers (particularly from the client space) to build new products without transition to an all-new process and incur rather massive costs. For example, if a company plans to build a mid-range product using IP of a high-end product implemented using N2P in 2027, it can do it with N2U in 2028.
"We continue to extend our 2nm platform with N2U, which provides additional improvements in performance, power, and density through design-technology co-optimization," Zhang said. "Our strategy is to continue enhancing each node after introduction, allowing customers to maximize the return on their design investments while still gaining incremental PPA benefits."
A16, A12, and N2X: Maximum performance at any cost
While TSMC's N2 is set to be adopted both for client and data center applications, the company preps A16 with its Super Power Rail backside power delivery that is specifically tailored for high performance data center applications. Essentially, A16 is N2P with SPR that will rely on the 1st Generation nanosheet GAA transistors and provide significant power, performance, and transistor density advantages over N2 and N2P nodes, albeit at higher cost.
It is noteworthy that TSMC now lists A16 as a 2027 process technology, which is technically a slip from 2026.
"A16 will be ready for production in 2026," Zhang said. "However, actual product ramp depends on customers, and we expect volume production to begin in 2027. That is why we aligned it to that timeline."
Interestingly, the arrival of A16 does not replace N2X, a performance-enhanced variant of N2P that uses traditional front side power delivery to push clocks of N2-based designs to the max.
A16 will pass the baton to A12 — set to arrive in 2029 — which is projected to bring full-node advantages to TSMC's data center-class nodes. While TSMC does not disclose actual numbers, expect A12 to offer the same kinds of benefits over A16 as A14 brings over N2 as it is set to rely on the company's 2nd Gen nanosheet GAA transistors and NanoFlex Pro technology.
“I can say that A16 is our first-generation technology with Super Power Rail, or backside power delivery, and A12 is the next generation,” Zhang said. “A13 and A12 are built on A14 with significant geometric scaling. To continue shrinking the frontside geometry, you also need to scale the backside to achieve overall density benefits. So there are many enhancements being implemented as we move from A16 to A12, particularly related to backside power delivery. That is all I can share.”
No High-NA on horizon
One interesting thing to note about TSMC's upcoming A13 and A12 process technologies due in 2029 is that none of them will require High-NA EUV lithography tools, which is stark contrast to Intel's approach to its 14A production node and successors that are set to use High-NA EUV scanners starting in 2027 – 2028.
"I tell you, I am amazed by our R&D team," said Kevin Zhang. "They continue to find a way to drive the technology scaling without using High-NA. One day they may have to use it, but at this point, we continue to be able to harvest the benefit from current EUV, not have to go to High-NA, which, you know, very, very expensive."
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
usertests Under N2U vs N2P:Reply
"8% - 10%" should be "-8% ~ -10%" to match the other columns indicating reductions. -
usertests I guess "N2U" is what passes for a budget node like N4C(heap). Not sure why they dropped the "C".Reply
Hopefully, SPR / backside power delivery becomes standard at some point after A12.
A14's mixed 1.2x "chip density" gain is not much less than the 1.23x logic density gain. Maybe this indicates it will be a great node for SRAM scaling, from the "2nd gen" GAAFET transistors. I'm surprised this aspect wasn't commented on before.
We have a leak of Zen 7 using ~98mm^2 "Silverton" chiplets with 16 cores, 2 MiB L2 cache per core, and 64 MiB L3 cache on the A14 node. If SRAM density is up 10-15% on that node, that could be the only thing preventing the chiplet from swelling to over 100mm^2. -
aldaia Definitely Moore's law is over, long ago!Reply
45 nm to 32 nm -> 2.1X density improvement
2N to 14A -> 1.2X density improvement -
usertests Reply
Moore's law is meant to be broken.aldaia said:Definitely Moore's law is over, long ago!
45 nm to 32 nm -> 2.1X density improvement
2N to 14A -> 1.2X density improvement
But if they are getting >1.13x SRAM density*, that will be a nice change since SRAM scaling was declared dead in 2022.
*1.13x should be the worse case scenario based on their numbers, assuming analog improves the exact same amount as logic: (0.7 * 1.23) + (0.3 * 1.13) = 1.2x "chip density" -
TerryLaze Reply
Moore's law isn't about density, it's about the total number of transistors on a CPU, and while back then those were only compute core nowadays we have almost a complete computer on the CPU and any part of that increasing would be part of Moore's law.aldaia said:Definitely Moore's law is over, long ago!
45 nm to 32 nm -> 2.1X density improvement
2N to 14A -> 1.2X density improvement -
bit_user Reply
Because it always adds cost, I could imagine it won't be included in their cost-optimized nodes.usertests said:Hopefully, SPR / backside power delivery becomes standard at some point after A12. -
bit_user Reply
I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong, but your supporting details aren't exactly comparable. These days, nodes are iterated more rapidly, but with smaller gains in between them.aldaia said:Definitely Moore's law is over, long ago!
45 nm to 32 nm -> 2.1X density improvement
2N to 14A -> 1.2X density improvement
It was never a law. It was just a sustainable pace of improvement that the industry was able to maintain for quite a while.usertests said:Moore's law is meant to be broken. -
bit_user Reply
This is from an article 5 years ago, but it sort of addresses your point:TerryLaze said:Moore's law isn't about density, it's about the total number of transistors on a CPU, and while back then those were only compute core nowadays we have almost a complete computer on the CPU and any part of that increasing would be part of Moore's law.
Just a couple of problems with that. First, transistors stopped getting cheaper:
Second, and perhaps largely due to the first, is that cloud operators are pushing higher clockspeeds, with fairly disastrous effects on system efficiency (i.e. invalidating the top line in the first plot).
Source: https://www.fabricatedknowledge.com/p/the-rising-tide-of-semiconductor -
TerryLaze Reply
There are all sorts of problems with moore's law, all I said was that it's not based on density.bit_user said:Just a couple of problems with that. -
aldaia Reply
Moore's Law is one of the most misunderstood predictions ever; people tend to misinterpret and oversimplify it (I apologize for doing the same). You're right that it's not about density, but it’s not about the total number of transistors either. Moore's original 1965 paper is about economics—'the number of components per integrated circuit for minimum cost'—and it was a prediction (certainly not a law) for the next 10 years. The fact that this prediction has held true for about 60 years is truly amazing.TerryLaze said:Moore's law isn't about density, it's about the total number of transistors on a CPU, and while back then those were only compute core nowadays we have almost a complete computer on the CPU and any part of that increasing would be part of Moore's law.
Around 2015 (give or take a couple of years), that prediction started to break down, as bit_user has pointed out.
This !!!bit_user said:First, transistors stopped getting cheaper: