White House cuts data centers, batteries, and AR from the US critical technology list — post-quantum cryptography, integrated photonics, high entropy alloys among new additions

White House
(Image credit: Getty / Kevin Carter)

The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has published its renewed National Security Science & Technology Strategy, and Appendix A of the 24-page document rewrites the federal Critical and Emerging Technologies (CET) list for the first time since February 2024, shrinking it from 18 categories to 14. Advanced cloud services, high-performance data storage and data centers, batteries, grid integration, gas turbine engines, and augmented and virtual reality have all gotten the chop, while post-quantum cryptography, integrated photonics, high entropy alloys, and "hardened operating systems for consumer use" have been added.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • Kindaian
    Considering that batteries are normally placed on critical power supply infrastructure and that they nowadays have internal compute controlling the power input/output and charging modes, I'm wondering if this is not underestimating the tech complexity with a brush stroke.
    Reply
  • xinoart
    Notice how these new additions and subtractions benefit musk, meta, et al. ;)
    Reply
  • jsdsparky
    xinoart said:
    Notice how these new additions and subtractions benefit musk, meta, et al. ;)
    Your comment is cynical. The changes cut both ways. Tesla probably isn't happy that their batteries and solar panels are no longer considered a priority by the government. And Meta renamed and reorganized their company around virtual/augmented reality, which was also removed from the list.
    Reply
  • xinoart
    Just because it's cynical, doesn't make any less true. Tesla is a complete loss on their vehicles. They have dropped drastically in the last few years and their QA leaves everything to be desired.

    Musk is getting money from govt. contracts for his SpaceX rockets and resupply rocket abilities.

    None of this changes much since all of his money comes from shady government contracts. NASA has been mostly outsourced to him.

    But yeah I'm cynical because I follow the money, I guess.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    jsdsparky said:
    The changes cut both ways. Tesla probably isn't happy that their batteries and solar panels are no longer considered a priority by the government.
    I also got the idea that Musk (or his backers) might've had a hand in this list:
    "brain-computer interfaces reappeared under future computing" sounds like it benefits Musk's Neuralink
    "space nuclear power and propulsion" sounds like it benefits SpaceX
    Robotics and "advanced spatial computing" sound like they could benefit Tesla's Optimus robots, which is where Musk sees the real potential for growth at Tesla.
    Various AI-related subjects sound like they could benefit X.AI (now part of SpaceX)
    That said, I don't think this is all about Musk. There are other venture capitalists and tech entrepreneurs involved in setting government priorities, these days. In fact, some of those firms will have investments in Musk's companies and could be advocating on his behalf, not as a favor but merely out of self-interest.

    jsdsparky said:
    And Meta renamed and reorganized their company around virtual/augmented reality, which was also removed from the list.
    Old news. Meta slashed and burned most of their AR and VR projects & teams, like a while ago. Like everybody else, they're now all-in on AI.
    Reply