Corsair Neutron XTi SSD Review

Early Verdict

Until Corsair and Phison work out the low random read performance the Neutron XTI will remain a mainstream SSD that will not sell with a premium price. The SSD delivers excellent heavy workload performance, but normal consumer workloads prove to be problematic.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Excellent steady-state performance

  • +

    Class-leading sequential performance under heavy workloads

  • +

    Excellent random write performance consistency under heavy workloads

  • +

    Low latency under heavy workloads

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Poor random read performance

  • -

    Poor random mixed workload performance

  • -

    Low consumer workload application performance

  • -

    Premium pricing

  • -

    Shallow accessory package

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Specifications And Features

Corsair returns to the premium SSD market with the new Neutron XTi, which doubles the SSD's onboard DRAM in a bid to improve performance and consistency. The extra DRAM also allows Corsair to increase capacity up to 2TB and deliver up to 560/540 MB/s of sequential read/write speed and 100,000/90,000 random read/write IOPS.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • Kimonajane
    Too expensive still. Better having a smaller SSD for programs and using big platter drives for storage. I don't know why the average Joe needs so much storage anyway. I guess if you digitally download movies or take many high resolution pictures. There is where cheap platter drives still win. Use one always for backup too.
    Reply
  • alan1476
    Samsung is still the leader in performance and price.
    Reply
  • Sakkura
    High-end SATA SSDs have been a little pointless (for consumer use) for a long time, but it's only getting worse as PCIe storage proliferates. Right now, 99.9% of people should either get an affordable mainstream/budget SATA SSD, or if they really need the speed, go for an M.2 PCIe (or U.2 or PCIe AIC) SSD. If you're gonna pay for a premium product, you might as well go for what's actually considerably faster across the board, rather than this kind of half measure.
    Reply
  • chalabam
    Most drives are now bottlenecked by SATA.

    And because a lot of people cannot change the motherboard to get no SATA drives, SATA drives should come with multiple parallel SATA connectors, and a software driver capable of using them to extract more speed out of the SATA interface.
    Reply
  • chalabam
    Most drives are now bottlenecked by SATA.

    And because a lot of people cannot change the motherboard to get M-2 or fancier, SATA drives should come with multiple parallel SATA connectors, and a software driver capable of using them to extract more speed out of the SATA interface.
    Reply
  • Sakkura
    18326906 said:
    Most drives are now bottlenecked by SATA.

    And because a lot of people cannot change the motherboard to get M-2 or fancier, SATA drives should come with multiple parallel SATA connectors, and a software driver capable of using them to extract more speed out of the SATA interface.

    No point, simpler to just run them in RAID0 if you need more speed.
    Reply
  • deus
    You'll be interested to kno none of the charts display in FF 47.0.1 and the same applies to the review of the SK hynix .
    Charts do show in IE 11.
    Nice.
    Lets earn money anyway we can, eh ?
    Reply
  • deus
    No chart shows in FF 47.0.1
    Reply
  • problematiq
    I wonder what intel/Microns Xpoint NVM's will do to SSD pricing.
    Reply