Fortnite cheater fined $175,000 for using cheats to win $6,850 in competitive tournaments — Epic bans player forever
The battle royale maker says, “We’ll donate what we collect to charity.”

Epic has won a legal lawsuit against a Fortnite player who consistently cheated in competitive tournaments and now owes the company $175,000 after ignoring a lawsuit filed last year. The culprit in question, Sebastian Araujo, had won more than $6,800 after participating in 839 cash tournaments within just four months, while using a direct memory access device to get around anti-cheat measures.
However, even after being busted, Araujo, instead of coming clean, created at least three fake accounts between June and October 2024 to avoid being caught, which led to Epic filing a legal lawsuit. Today, the company says, “The Judge ruled in our favor after the cheater ignored our lawsuit. The player is required to pay $175,000, and we’ll donate what we collect to charity. They are also banned from playing Fortnite forever.”
THIS JUST IN: The Judge ruled in our favor after the cheater ignored our lawsuit. The player is required to pay $175,000 and we’ll donate what we collect to charity. They are also banned from playing Fortnite forever. https://t.co/on0dYWBdq4June 25, 2025
How has Epic landed on such a figure?
According to the ruling information, Epic secured a default judgment of $168,550 for DMCA and Copyright Act violations, along with another $6,971 in attorneys' fees. The reason the player’s fine is 25 times higher than their total winnings is that the developer demanded the statutory minimum of $200 for each violation of the game’s copyright across all 839 tournaments Araujo participated in.
Court documentation shared with IGN reads, “While the Court notes the amount sought by Plaintiff exceedingly surpasses Defendant's alleged actual gain, $6,850, Defendant took significant measures to conceal the true scope of his cheating activities by creating multiple fake accounts and employing a hardware spoofer to circumvent detections.”
It wasn’t a total win for the battle royale maker either, as their request for another $100,000 in statutory damages for copyright infringement was found to be “excessive” compared to Araujo’s actual stolen gains. That being said, Epic plans to donate the money Araujo must now pay to Child’s Play, a charity dedicated to improving the lives of children by providing access to toys and games.
Not the first time Epic has made an example out of a cheater
Interestingly, this isn’t the first time Epic has gone all-in on a tournament cheater. Back in February 2025, the Fortnite makers not only banned Morgan “Repulse God” from participating in Fortnite tournaments for good and required them to return their ill-gotten gains, but also compelled them to publish a public apology on their YouTube channel, acknowledging their actions and promising never to repeat them.
From both of these cases, it’s clear that Epic takes this sort of thing seriously, and its efforts to “ramp up legal action against both players who cheat and cheat sellers”, as part of its push to bolster competitive integrity in tournaments, are definitely underway.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
derekullo They won't collect anything and despite being banned he can still create accounts when his other one gets banned ... as he has already done lol.Reply -
Dr3ams Too bad Ubisoft doesn't do the same for cheaters in The Division 2. PVP in the Darkzones isn't worth the time because of cheaters.Reply -
Brainle55 We ban "cheaters" (all of them?) from games, the futility!Reply
It's a shame we don't do something useful just once for the good of the population: do it in politics!
Hmm, okay, okay, there wouldn't be anyone left... -
AtrociKitty Epic secured a default judgment of $168,550 for DMCA and Copyright Act violations
Absolutely dystopian. It always disturbs me when people cheer these sorts of rulings because they're stapled to the "cheater" label.
The landmark Game Genie lawsuit back in 1992 found runtime code modification to be legal and fair use. But fast forward to today, and it has become commonplace for companies to sue cheat programmers and distributors. This same interpretation of the law endangers mods and fan projects, which are now likewise considered copyright violations, even if not always pursued by the copyright holders.
Don't stop hating cheaters, but cheats and the act of cheating should never be a copyright violation. -
SomeoneElse23
It is indeed a violation of DMCA.AtrociKitty said:Absolutely dystopian. It always disturbs me when people cheer these sorts of rulings because they're stapled to the "cheater" label.
The landmark Game Genie lawsuit back in 1992 found runtime code modification to be legal and fair use. But fast forward to today, and it has become commonplace for companies to sue cheat programmers and distributors. This same interpretation of the law endangers mods and fan projects, which are now likewise considered copyright violations, even if not always pursued by the copyright holders.
Don't stop hating cheaters, but cheats and the act of cheating should never be a copyright violation.
However, DMCA shouldn't exist.
The jury should have tossed that one out.
(The don't want you to know that jury nullification of that 'we the people' don't agree with is legit.) -
64-bit dreamer The game genie example is poor and your modding justification is kinda shortsighted.Reply
1) DMCA didn't exist in 1992 when that verdict happened so the court could not have judged this case based on that standard. 2)Technology is immensely more advanced than it was 3 decades ago and that has changed gaming. 3) Modders and fan projects arent innocent either. I've seen many of immoral and unethical mods and projects (along with websites/forums dedicated to them) and its only natural that a company wouldnt want their copyrighted property associated with that nonsense.
But I get you. Not everyone is cheating or creating bad things. Your issue then should be the ones messing it up for everyone, not the laws that hold them accountable. -
ianbalgas
You... do realize that these things you've listed generally aren't a problem at all until they modify source code? Y'know, since the source code is copyrighted, and there's not really a legal avenue for the average joe to get the source code for any given game... The court case is hardly relevant, as it deals with single player, buy-and-own games, not free to play online multiplayer games, and certainly not tournaments based on them. Not to mention that the license agreement he signed in order to play in the first place lays it out pretty clearly;AtrociKitty said:The landmark Game Genie lawsuit back in 1992 found runtime code modification to be legal and fair use. But fast forward to today, and it has become commonplace for companies to sue cheat programmers and distributors. This same interpretation of the law endangers mods and fan projects, which are now likewise considered copyright violations, even if not always pursued by the copyright holders.
You may not do or attempt to do any of the following with respect to the Software or any of its parts: (a) use it commercially or for a promotional purpose except as Epic expressly authorizes; (b) copy, reproduce, distribute (including via a network server), display, or use it in a way that is not expressly authorized in this Agreement; (c) sell, rent, lease, license, distribute, or otherwise transfer it; (d) reverse engineer, derive source code from, modify, adapt, translate, decompile, or disassemble it or make derivative works based on it; (e) remove, disable, circumvent, or modify any proprietary notice or label or security technology included in it; (f) create, develop, distribute, or use any unauthorized software programs to gain advantage in any online or other game modes; (g) use it to infringe or violate the rights of any third party, including but not limited to any intellectual property, publicity, or privacy rights; (h) use, export, or re-export it in violation of any applicable law or regulation
Say what you will of copyright, but this is clear cut and hardly even a copyright issue. Don't show up to your local library, start writing in the margins of books and then complain if you're kicked out and sued. The guy ruined almost 1000 cash tournaments for who knows how many players. It's indefensible.